Open Access

Preliminary clinic study on computer assisted mandibular reconstruction: the positive role of surgical navigation technique

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery201537:20

DOI: 10.1186/s40902-015-0017-1

Received: 1 June 2015

Accepted: 23 June 2015

Published: 30 July 2015

Abstract

Background

The objectives of the present study were to investigate the reliability and outcomes of computer-assisted techniques in mandibular reconstruction with a fibula flap and verify whether the surgical navigation system was feasible in mandible reconstructive surgery.

Methods

Eight cases were enrolled in the computer assisted surgery (CAS) group and 14 cases in the traditional group. The shaping and fixation of the fibula grafts were guided by computer assisted techniques, which could be monitored with the BrainLAB surgical navigation system. The variation of mandible configuration was evaluated by CT measurement in the Mimics software, including the variation of length, width, height and gonial angle of the mandible. The 3D facial soft tissue alteration was also analyzed in 3D chromatogram by Geomagic software.

Results

All 22 fibula flaps survived. The mandibular configurations and facial contours had a better clinic result in the CAS group. The length, width, height and gonial angle of the reconstructive mandible were more similar to the original one. The Wilcoxon rank sum test analysis suggested significant differences in the measurements. The chromatographic analysis also visually showed superiority over the traditional group.

Conclusions

The computer assisted surgical navigation method used in mandibular reconstruction is feasible and precise for clinical application. The contour of the reconstructed mandible and facial symmetry are improved with computer techniques.

Keywords

Computer assisted surgery Mandibular defect Fibula flap Surgical navigation

Background

The loss of mandibular continuity caused by ablative tumor therapy, osteomyelitis or severe trauma could affect a patient’s quality of life both physiologically and psychologically. The complexity of mandibular anatomy creates a great challenge for plastic surgeons to reconstruct the facial contour and rehabilitate the occlusal function [1, 2]. With the development of surgical techniques and instruments, functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of mandibular defects have become a basic goal for surgeons [35].

To achieve satisfactory mandibular contour and masticatory function, the correct occlusal relationship and condyle position are particularly important. Optimal 3D configuration of the graft is the crucial factor affecting the facial contour and the occlusal relationship [6, 7]. The computer assisted surgery (CAS) techniques,which mainly consist of computer aided design/computer aided manufacture (CAD/CAM), rapid prototyping (RP), reverse engineering (RE), and surgical navigation technique, have dramatically improved the precision of graft placements. With preoperative planning and intra-operative navigation, these techniques can help plastic surgeons to manage mandibular reconstructive surgery. This study compared the CAS group and the traditional group of mandibular reconstruction using free fibula flaps to analyze the variations of the mandible and 3D facial contour.

Methods

Eight patients, two males and six females, with an average age of 33.3 years (24 ~ 53 years), were enrolled in the CAS group in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Peking University School of Stomatology, from June 2009 to June 2012. The causes of the mandibular defects were tumors, six malignant and two benign [Table 1]. The control group, as a traditional treatment, involved 14 patients during the same time period. The mean age was 54.9 years (18 ~ 78 years), seven males and seven females. All of these patients underwent mandibular reconstruction by experienced surgeons without computer assisted techniques. The operations in this study were performed by the same team of surgeons. For each patient, there would be both ablative and reconstructive surgery groups with 2–3 surgeons operating simultaneously. All of the operations were directed by one first surgeon, who has been working as a constructive surgeon for more than 10–15 years. This study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(NO.: PKUSSIRB-201310110). Consent forms were signed by the patients and family members.
Table 1

Basic information of the computer assisted group

Patient

Gender

Age

Pathology

Resection area

Fibula segments

Computer technique

1

F

27

Sarcoma

Body, symphysis

3

Surgical template

2

F

48

Ossifying fibroma

Body

1

Navigation

3

F

29

Osteosarcoma

Body, ramus

2

Navigation

4

F

53

Odontogenic keratocyst

Body

1

Navigation

5

F

26

Enameloblastoma

Body, symphysis

1

Navigation

6

F

34

Osteosarcoma

Body, ramus, condyle

2

Navigation

7

M

25

Hemangiosarcoma

Body, ramus, condyle

2

Surgical template + navigation

8

M

24

Osteosarcoma

Body, symphysis

3

Surgical template + navigation

All patients received pre- and post-operative CT scans (BrightSpeed Edge Select 8 slice, USA). The medical data was recorded in a generic DICOM format and transferred to the computer work station. The 3D facial scans were also recorded by 3dMD patient Software 4.0, USA.

Before surgery, simultaneous mandibulectomy and reconstruction planning was performed in a virtual environment. The software used for virtual planning consisted of SurgiCase CMF 5.0 (Materialise,Belgium), and Mimics 10.01 (Materialise,Belgium). The surgical navigation system utilized for intra-operative supervision was the BrainLAB VectorVision iPlan® CMF 3.0 System. Geomagic Studio 12.0 software was utilized for chromatographic analysis. With upgraded point-cloud handling and polygon mesh processing, it could visualize the differences of the pre and post 3D facial configurations, used for demonstration to the patients.

Mandibular reconstruction guided by surgical template

The reconstructed mandibular models were fabricated with the CAD/CAM technique. A titanium template was made according to the virtual design for the bone graft through rapid prototyping (RP) technique and served as a guide when surgeons were shaping and placing the fibula grafts.

Mandibular reconstruction guided by surgical navigation technique

An individual dental splint was fabricated to fix the mandible to the maxilla before surgery, which could secure the mandible as a stable part to the skull. In that case, the mobile mandible could be assumed as one rigid piece of the skull during surgical navigation. The thin-cut axial CT scan of the mandible was performed with the splint fixing the occlusion. The CT data was imported into the SurgiCase CMF 5.0, where 3D virtual osteotomies, bony reductions and fibula reconstructions were performed [Fig. 1]. The osteotomy lines and the position of the fibula graft were designed according to the 3D images in the virtual platform. Several reference landmarks were set on the residual mandible surface, along the posterior and inferior margins of the fibula as guidance for placing bone grafts [Fig. 2].
Fig. 1

Osteosarcoma of the right condyle, ramus andmandible body. Virtual osteotomy and fibula reconstruction were simulated on the Surgicase workstation

Fig. 2

Guide points (red) were set up in the Mimics workstation, which could induce the precise placement of the fibula flap. These landmarks would be drilled on the surface of the residual mandible before osteotomy, and the reposition of these landmarks under surgical navigation suggest the original position of the residual mandible

Mandibular reconstruction guided by both the surgical template and navigation techniques

According to the experience of the authors, in some complex cases, especially secondary reconstruction cases, a combination of the surgical template and navigation technique might improve the precision of the surgery. The surgical template was placed on the dissociated mandible to shape the graft [Fig. 3], meanwhile the residual mandible was rigidly fixed to the patient’s skull. With the help of the navigation system, the position of the grafts could be adjusted in 3 dimensions [Fig. 4].
Fig. 3

Specific fibula resin surgical template was fabricated to shape the graft, which also helped to place the fibula into the designed position

Fig. 4

After natural head posture registration, the BrainLab navigation system permitted 3D analysis to help the surgeon to quantify a complex position of the bone graft. The navigation system projected the location of the surgical probe on a computer monitor in axial, coronal, sagittal and 3D views. The position of the fibula could be verified intra-operatively

Outcome assessment and statistical analysis

The primary outcome measurements are the 3D dimensional changes of the mandible before and after surgery. We aimed at recreating the original dimensions of the mandible with the free fibula flaps. Therefore, an ideal outcome was that there were no changes in the 3D measurement of the distances among the selected mandibular landmarks [Table 2]. The group that had less change in 3D dimension was considered to have favorable outcomes.
Table 2

Mandible anatomic landmarks and 3D measurements

Abbreviation

Anatomic point

Measured item/mm

Ci

condylion internale

Ci-Ci

Cl

condylion laterale

Cl-Cl

Co

condylion

Co-Gn

Cp

coronoid process

Co-Go

Ga

gonial angle

Cp-Cp

Gn

gnathion

Go-Gn

Go

gonion

Go-Go

Lm

lingula mandibulae

Lm-Lm

Me

menton

 

Po

pogonion

 
We compared the 3D changes of the mandibular configurations before and after surgery in both groups. The reference points were calculated on the Mimics software for 3 times and the average was chosen as the compared value. Anatomic landmarks indicating the length, width, height and the angle of both the deformed mandible and the reconstructive mandible were measured [Fig. 5]. For the reconstructive fibula, Ci (condylion internale) was defined as the internal vertex of the top of the fibula bone, Cl (condylion laterale) the lateral vertex and Co (condylion), the center of the top. The Gonial angle was defined as the angle of the posterior central border of the ramus and lower central border of the mandible body. Other reference points were defined in the same way as anatomy on cephalography. Among the ramus and condyle involved reconstruction, the Lm (lingula mandibulae) and CP (coronoid process) might not be able to be recovered with fibula flap, which we did not take into calculation. All measurements were performed in 3D software Mimics 10.01.
Fig. 5

Mandible anatomic landmarks and 3D measurements. The landmarks were shown in (a) lateral and (b) posterior view

Due to the low sample size, the non-parametric analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the variations of the CAS group and the traditional group, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Mandibular reconstruction was performed accurately according to the virtual planning, all 22 fibula flaps survived. The anatomic landmark measurements of the mandible configuration, included the Gonial angle (Ga), the distance of Condylion - Gonion (Co-Go), Gonion - Gonion (Go-Go), Condylion internale - Condylion internale (Ci-Ci), Condylion laterale - Condylion laterale (Cl-Cl), Coronoid process - Coronoid process (Cp-Cp), Lingula mandibulae - Lingula mandibulae (Lm-Lm), Condylion - Gnathion (Co-Gn) and Gonion - Gnathion (Go-Gn), all these items in the CAS group had less change as compared to the traditional group, even though the amplitude varied respectively [Fig. 6].
Fig. 6

The variations of the 3D measurements

Based on the Wilcoxon rank sum test analysis, the variations of Ci-Ci, Cl-Cl, Cp-Cp and Go-Gn had significant differences statistically, while Ga, Co-Go, Go-Go, Lm-Lm and Co-Gn did not [Table 3]. This result indicated that the CAS group might have advantages in maintaining the original configuration of the mandible compared to the traditional group.
Table 3

The statistical analysis results

Items/ |X| ± 2SE

Traditional group

CAS group

P

Ga/°

13.72 ± 5.77

5.49 ± 3.75

>0.05

Co-Go/mm

7.53 ± 4.47

4.65 ± 5.18

>0.05

Go-Go/mm

5.22 ± 2.40

4.24 ± 3.73

>0.05

Ci-Ci/mm

4.42 ± 1.70

2.58 ± 3.36

<0.05

Cl-Cl/mm

5.66 ± 3.45

2.99 ± 3.86

<0.05

Cp-Cp/mm

6.28 ± 2.17

0.77 ± 0.74

<0.05

Lm-Lm/mm

2.78 ± 2.73

1.09 ± 0.84

>0.05

Go-Gn/mm

7.93 ± 3.29

2.99 ± 1.93

<0.05

Co-Gn/mm

6.99 ± 3.49

4.29 ± 1.81

>0.05

The clinical outcome showed that the configuration of the mandible was precisely recovered as compared to the original shape. The chromatographic analysis showed only a slight change of the facial contour2–4 weeks after surgery, which could exclude post-surgical swelling [Figs. 7 and 8, same case as Figs. 1 and 2].
Fig. 7

Mandible defect and fibula flap reconstruction with CAS technique

Fig. 8

Chromatographic analysis showed satisfied outcome of the reconstructive contour

Discussion

Over the past 30 years, the CAS techniques have been widely used in surgical procedures worldwide. In oral and maxillofacial surgery, more and more attention has been paid to the individual and functional reconstruction of the maxillofacial defects. The concept of virtual surgery with surgical simulation rather than relying exclusively on intra-operative manual reconstruction has been widely accepted. It’s believed that particularly in complex cases, CAS techniques will improve the surgical outcomes in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery [811]. The optimal outcome for mandibular reconstruction is to achieve a mandible of correct shape according to the original or natural condition and satisfactory positioning of the condyle in the glenoid fossa [1214]. The reconstruction of mandibular defects is challenging because of its complexity and unique characteristics, especially concerning facial esthetics and occlusal relations [15, 16].

With modern CAS techniques, the individual mandibular model can be fabricated using CT data, which is valuable for the shaping procedure of the bone graft in a virtual environment before the actual surgery [1720]. Intra-operative navigation systems, initially developed for neurosurgical applications, allow the surgeons to determine the precise location of any instrument or bony anatomic landmark to within approximately 1 – 2 mm. The availability of 3D computer planning software and the use of 3D models in various surgical disciplines allows for an improved and more predictable reconstruction outcome [2125].

The CAS techniques can enable the clinicians to operate virtually before the surgery, and progress from simple 2D images to sophisticated 3D surgical simulation covering intra-operative procedures such as virtual reality osteotomies and placement of bone grafts. Utilizing CT guided 3D techniques, an intra-operative template can be fabricated to transfer the virtual design to reality. Traditionally, the position of bone grafts are assured by the surgeons’ experience and the final result confirmed by CT scan. If any mistake occurred, there was no chance for modification besides secondary surgery. With the help of the surgical navigation system, the position of the bone graft, the dental occlusion and the condyle’s position could be confirmed intra-operatively. The surgical simulation with 3D stereolithographic models can also help to establish confidence for the clinician, improve young surgeons’ operating skills, and demonstrate the procedure for patients.

The fabrication of the 3D stereolithographic model, the usage of the dental splint, and the registration of the navigation system would require extra work before surgery. And it is debatable that whether the slightly better result is worth all of the extra preparation, as well as the increased cost to the patients. Clinicians were also questioning whether the CAS techniques require wider resection margins. In our study, depending on the malignancy of the biopsy, the resection margins were placed 5–10 mm extensively beyond the visualized borders of the lesion in 3D view. For margin safety, in some cases, wider resection might be necessary. However, since most patients enrolled would have more than 10.0 cm mandibular defects, it is considered acceptable to have wider resections.

In our study, it seemed that young age patients would prefer CAS techniques more likely than old age patients, since they were more concerned about the esthetic outcome of the reconstructive configuration. Meanwhile, young age patients tended to have more stable occlusal relation of the jaws due to less missing teeth, which would contribute to the accuracy of the mandible surgical navigation.

Registration technique is the key element in the precision of surgical navigation. People used to believe that the navigation system is not suitable for mandible surgery because of the movement of the jaw. In our study, we fabricated a dental splint to fix the mandible to the skull to control the mobility. We drilled several landmarks on the residual mandible surface before osteotomy as the reference points. After osteotomy, the recovery of the condyle and coronoid process was based on the reposition of these landmarks.

The results of our study showed that some measured items of mandibular configuration were even better in the traditional group than the CAS group. It seemed that even though the experienced surgeons can place the fibula flap in an ideal position without computer techniques, this would not be an argument against CAS techniques. Because the precise position of the fibula graft could mostly be achieved with CAS techniques while it costs a long time and effort to become an experienced surgeon, which would take at least 10 to 15 years.

Conclusions

The new designed surgical navigation method applied in mandibular reconstruction is feasible, precise enough for clinical application. The contour of the reconstructed mandible of the computer assisted group has a better outcome than traditional group.

Abbreviations

CAS: 

Computer assisted surgery

Ci: 

Condylion internale

Cl: 

Condylion laterale

Co: 

Condylion

Cp: 

Coronoid process

Ga: 

Gonial angle

Gn: 

Gnathion

Go: 

Gonion

Lm: 

Lingula mandibulae

Me: 

Menton

Po: 

Pogonion

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, 2012AA041606) and the Beijing Municipal Development Foundation (Nos. Z111107058811038 and Z131107002213093, China)

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology

References

  1. Rashid M, Tamimy MS, Ehtesham-Ul-Haq SSU, Rizvi ST (2012) Benign paediatric mandibular tumours: experience in reconstruction using vascularised fibula. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:325–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shan XF, Cai ZG, Zhang J, Zhang JG (2009) Bimaxillary reconstruction with vascularised and non-vascularised fibula. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:474–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Punpale AS, Rajendra Prasad JS, Shetty KP, Kadam S, Udupa V (2006) An innovative design for simultaneous reconstruction of complexmaxillo-mandibular defects with single free fibula osteocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:96–101PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nanjappa M, Natashekara M, Sendil Kumar C, Kumaraswamy SV, Keerthi R, Ashwin DP et al (2011) Transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular defects": our experience. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:93–100PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Noordhoek R, Pizer ME, Laskin DM (2012) Ameloblastic fibrosarcoma of the mandible: treatment, long-term follow-up, and subsequent reconstruction of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2930–5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ (2013) Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope 123:597–604PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Katsuragi Y, Kayano S, Akazawa S, Naqamatsu S, Koizumi T, Matsui T et al (2011) Mandible reconstruction using the calcium-sulphate three-dimensional model and rubber stick: a new method, ‘mould technique’, for more accurate, efficient and simplified fabrication. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:614–22PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tepper O, Hirsch D, Levine J, Garfein E (2012) The new age of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:192–4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zheng GS, Su YX, Liao GQ, Jiao PF, Liang LZ, Zhang SE et al (2012) Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and transferring templates: cadaveric study of accuracy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1480–5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Harsha G, Reddy SG, Talasila S, Salaam SA, Srinivasulu M, Reddy VS (2012) Mandibular reconstruction using AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plate: a retrospective study of 36 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 13:75–9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yamanaka Y, Yajima H, Kirita T, Shimomura H, Tamaki S, Aoki K et al (2010) Mandibular reconstruction with vascularised fibular osteocutaneous flaps using prefabricated stereolithographic mandibular model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1751–3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zheng GS, Su YX, Liao GQ, Chen ZF, Wang L, Jiao PF et al (2012) Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative virtual surgical simulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113:604–11PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopez-Arcas JM, Arias J, Del Castillo JL, Burgueno M, Navarrol I, Moran MJ et al (2010) The fibula osteomyocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction: a 15-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2377–84PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin PY, Lin KC, Jeng SF (2011) Oromandibular reconstruction: the history, operative options and strategies, and our experience. ISRN Surg 2011:824251PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. SimonnEN MMA, Shubi FM, Kalyanyama BM, Stoelinga PJ (2006) Reconstruction of the mandible after ablative surgery for the treatment of aggressive, benign odontogenic tumours in Tanzania: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:421–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Khadka A, Hu J (2012) Autogenous grafts for condylar reconstruction in treatment of TMJ ankylosis: current concepts and considerations for the future. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:94–102PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang G, Li J, Khadka A, Hsu Y, Li W, Hu J (2012) CAD/CAM and rapid prototyped titanium for reconstruction of ramus defect and condylar fracture caused by mandibular reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113:356–61PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sink J, Hamlar D, Kademani D, Khariwala SS (2012) Computer-aided stereolithography for presurgical planning in fibula free tissue reconstruction of the mandible. J Reconstr Microsurg 28:395–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ciocca L, Mazzoni S, Fantini M, Marchetti C, Scotti R (2012) The design and rapid prototyping of surgical guides and bone plates to support iliac free flaps for mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:859–61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou JS, Chen M, Pan CB, Wang M, Wang JG, Zhang B et al (2012) Application of CAD/CAM-assisted technique with surgical treatment in reconstruction of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:432–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalbermatten DF, Hauq M, Schaefer DJ, Wolfinger E, Schumacher R, Messmer P et al (2004) Computer aided designed neo-clavicle out of osteotomized free fibula: case report. Br J Plast Surg 57:668–72PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ueda K, Tajima S, Oba S, Omiya Y, Byun SI, Okada M (2001) Mandibular contour reconstruction with three-dimensional computer-assisted models. Ann Plast Surg 46:387–93PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopes N, Oliveira DM, Vajgel A, Pita I, Bezerra T, Vasconcellos RJ (2009) A new approach for reconstruction of a severely atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2455–9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Vakharia KT, Natoli NB, Johnson TS (2012) Stereolithography-aided reconstruction of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:194–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahdian N, Dostalova T, Danek J, Nedoma J, Kohout J, Hubacek M et al (2013) 3D reconstruction of TMJ after resection of the cyst and the stress-strain analyses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 110:279–289PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.