Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear regression analysis for the prognostic factors influencing the survival rate of OSCC

From: Prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of recurrence and pTNM stage

Factor

Recurrence

pTNM stage

LNM

DOI

Differentiation

RT

LVI

Recurrence

Pearson Correlation

1

.463a

.373a

.307a

.162b

.356a

.117

Sig. (2-tailed)

 

.000

.000

.000

.036

.000

.132

pTNM stage

Pearson Correlation

.463a

1

.518a

.562a

.123

.366a

.145

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

 

.000

.000

.114

.000

.061

NM

Pearson Correlation

.373a

.518a

1

.205a

.067

.361a

.211a

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

 

.008

.390

.000

.006

DOI

Pearson Correlation

.307a

.562a

.205a

1

.107

.243a

.099

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

.008

 

.166

.001

.202

Differentiation

Pearson Correlation

.162b

.123

.067

.107

1

.021

.159b

Sig. (2-tailed)

.036

.114

.390

.166

 

.791

.039

RT

Pearson Correlation

.356a

.366a

.361a

.243a

.021

1

.123

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

.000

.001

.791

 

.114

LVI

Pearson Correlation

.117

.145

.211a

.099

.159b

.123

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.132

.061

.006

.202

.039

.114

 
  1. NM neck metastasis, DOI depth of invasion, LVI lymphovascular invasion, RT radiotherapy
  2. aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
  3. bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)