Table 1 Cases published in the literature of recorded “jaw-in-a-day” procedures
Reference | Year | n | Gender | Average age (year) | Pathology | Location | Flap | Average implants | Average teeth restoration | Follow-up time (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Levine et al. [8] | 2013 | 4 | 2 M, 2 F | 25.8 (20–34) | 2 Ame, 1 OM, 1 AM | 3 Man, 1 Max | Fibular flap | 5.3 (4–6) | 8.8 (4–12) | 14.5 (10–22) |
Qaisi et al. [12] | 2016 | 3 | 2 M, 1 F | 44.3 (23–76) | 3 Ame | 3 Man | Fibular flap | 3.7 (3–4) | 7.0 (5–10) | 11.0 (4–17) |
Runyan et al. [13] | 2016 | 1 | F | 26.0 | ES | Max | Fibular flap | 3.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 |
Patel et al. [4] | 2019 | 2 | 2 F | 19.5 (19–20) | 2O M | 1 Man, 1 Max | Fibular flap | 3.5 (3–4) | 6.5 (5–8) | NA |
Sukato et al. [14] | 2020 | 2 | 1 M, 1 F | 43.0 (35–51) | 1 Ame, 1 Tra | 2 Man | Fibular flap | 5.5 (5–6) | 12.0 (12–12) | 6.0 (6–6) |
Grewal et al. [15] | 2021 | 1 | M | 51.0 | OKC | Man | Fibular flap | 3.0 | 10.0 | 24.0 |