Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of included studies

From: Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on recovery from neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author/year

Design

Treatment/control group

Split-mouth design

Mean age (years) control/treatment

Type of surgery

Follow-up period after surgery (month)

Follow-up period after LLLT (month)

Wavelength (nm)

Energy (J) /energy density (J/cm2)

Power (mw)

Period of application (sec per point)

Total number of LLLT sessions

Days of LLLT (post-operation)

Treatment side/control side

Führer-Valdivia 2014 [17]

DB-RCT

16/14

 

21.5 (8)/23 (5)

BSSRO

6

5

810 ± 20

9/32

100

90

8

1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14, 21, 28

Gasperini 2014 [18]

DB-RCT

 

10/10

30/30

BSSRO

2

1

660-789-780

1.2/5

20-60-70

10-20-40

14

0, 1, 2, 3, +10 days with 48 h intervalª

Mohajerani 2017 [33]

DB-RCT

10/10

 

22.8 ± 3.6/24.1 ± 4.6

BSSRO

6

5

810-632

−/5

−/2

 

90

6

1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 28

Eshghpour 2017 [13]

DB-RCT

 

16/16

23.1 ± 4.4/23.1 ± 4.4

BSSRO

2

1

660-810

2/1.5

2/7

200

10

9

1, 2, 3, +6 days in 3 weeks

Guarini 2017 [19]

DB-RCT

33/9

 

29.8 (24)/25.8 (22)

BSSRO

24

23

810 ± 20

9/31.8

100

 

8

1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14, 21, 28

Buysse Temprano 2017 [31]

SB-RCT

 

12/12

30 /30

BSSRO

1

0

808

2.8/100

100

28

10

  

Esmaeelinejad 2018 [32]

DB-RCT

20/20

 

27.35 ± 3.35/25.7 ± 4.06

BSSRO

13

12

810

−/8.4

70

60

10

0, 1, 2, 3, +6 days in 2 weeksª

Sharifi 2020 [34]

TB-RCT

 

18/18

23 ± 5/23 ± 5

BSSRO

2

1

980

−/12

100

60

7

−1, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28ª

  1. DB-RCT Double-blind randomized controlled trial, SB-RCT Single-blind randomized controlled trial, TB-RCT Triple-blind randomized controlled trial, BSSRO Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, LLLT Low-level laser therapy, a: 0 = immediately after surgery, −1: a day before surgery