Skip to main content

Table 2 A brief comparison between masks and respirators

From: Reopening of dental clinics during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an evidence-based review of literature for clinical interventions

Mask type

Standard

Filtration effectiveness

Re-usability

Single-use medical masks

China: YY/T0969

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: not effective

No

Surgical masks

China : YY 0469

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: > 30%

No

Surgical masks

USA: ASTM F2100

Level 1

Level 2, 3

No

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: > 95%

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: > 95%

Surgical masks

Europe: EN 14683

Type 1

Type 2,3

No

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: > 95%

3.0 microns: > 95%

0.1 microns: > 95%

Respirator masks

USA: NIOSH 42 CFR 84

N95

N99

N100

Yes (under especial conditions)

0.3 microns: > 95%

0.3 microns: > 99%

0.3 microns: > 99.97%

Respirator masks

Europe: EN 149: 2001

FFP1

FFP2

FFP3

Yes (under especial conditions)

0.3 microns : >80%

0.3 microns : >94%

0.3 microns : >99%

Elastomeric respirators

USA: NIOSH 42 CFR 84

10 to 50 APF

Yes

PAPR

USA: NIOSH 42 CFR 84

1000 APF

Yes

  1. PAPR powered air-purifying respirator. APF assigned protection factor