- Open Access
Effect on bone formation of the autogenous tooth graft in the treatment of peri-implant vertical bone defects in the minipigs
© Kim et al.; licensee Springer. 2015
- Received: 9 January 2015
- Accepted: 9 January 2015
- Published: 29 January 2015
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of autogenous tooth bone as a graft material for regeneration of bone in vertical bony defects of the minipigs.
Material and Methods
Six minipigs were used in this study. Four molars were extracted in the right mandibular dentition and sent to the Korea Tooth Bank for fabrication of autogenous tooth bone. Ten days later, each extraction site was implanted with MS Implant Narrow Ridge 3.0x10mm fixture (Osstem, Seoul, Korea) after standardized 2mm-sized artificial vertical bony defect formation. Pineappleshaped Root-On type autogenous tooth bones were applied to the vertical defects around the neck area of the posterior three fixtures and the fore-most one was not applied with autogenous bone as a control group. Each minipig was sacrificed at 4, 8, 12 weeks after fixture installation and examined radiologically and histologically. Histological evaluation was done under light microscope with Villanueva osteochrome bone staining with semi-quantitative histomorphometric study. Percentage of new bone over total area (NBF) and bone to implant contact (BIC) ratio were evaluated using digital software for area calculation.
NBF were 48.15 ± 18.02%, 45.50 ± 28.37%, and 77.13 ± 15.30% in 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively for experimental groups. The control group showed 37.00 ± 11.53%, 32.25 ± 26.99%, and 1.33 ± 2.31% in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. BIC ratio were 53.08 ± 19.82%, 45.00 ± 28.37%, and 75.13 ± 16.55% in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. Those for the control groups were 38.33 ± 6.43%, 33.50 ± 29.51 %, and 1.33 ± 2.31% in 4, 8, 12 weeks, respectively.
Autogenous tooth bone showed higher score than control group in NBF and BIC in all the data encompassing 4,8,12 weeks specimens, but statistically significant only 12 weeks data in both NBF and BIC.
- Bone Graft
- Bone Defect
- Alveolar Bone
- Graft Material
- Autogenous Bone
Most edentulous patients visit dental clinics only after a long time has passed after losing their teeth. Unfortunately, an appropriate recovery of oral functions is difficult in most of these patients due to accompanying alveolar bone losses. Tooth losses are unavoidably accompanied by alveolar bone losses so that satisfactory outcomes cannot be obtained in the stage of functional recovery with only the placement of implants that just substitute for teeth. The alveolar bone lost along with the lost teeth should be restored in this case. The most useful method to this end known thus far is autogenous bone grafts, which have been known to be safe in that there is no risk of foreign body reactions, as autogenous bones are immunologically the same as the alveolar bone and there is no risk of disease infection and they have excellent effectiveness in terms of absorption rates after grafts. However, methods that can substitute for autogenous bone grafts have been searched for due to autogenous bone grafts’ demerits, such as the necessity for additional surgeries for bone harvest, resulting in complications such as infection and pain, and the insufficient quantity obtained from autogenous bones in the mouth [1–3]. Recently, taking note of the fact that the constituents of teeth are similar to those of bones, methods that use teeth powder block treated through certain processes have come to the fore.
Bone grafts are being made using materials extracted from autogenous teeth. These materials have excellent biocompatibility without any immune reactions or foreign body reactions because they are autogenous tissues developed by taking note of the fact that the constituents of teeth are similar to those of bones, involve no risk of disease infection, and are not physiologically rejected by patients. When extracted teeth are demineralized, organic components are removed and the inorganic component hydroxyapatite remains as a main component. The components of tooth bone, which is a graft material made by using teeth, have already been experimentally verified in many studies and papers [4–9]. However, those studies are different from the present study, as most of them are in regard to tooth bone made from other persons’ teeth already extracted after removing all organic components for immunological safety and safety against infection transmission. The present study approached the effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone grafts that have the same benefits as autogenous bone grafts in that rejection of transplant can be fundamentally blocked because autogenous tooth bone, immunologically speaking, has the same origin as autogenous bone, so that the possibility of the transmission of a source of infection between different persons or species can be fundamentally blocked.
In the present study, the effects of bone graft materials made using extracted autogenous teeth were examined through animal experiments using minipigs. Vertical bone defects were artificially made to control the amount of lost bones, autogenous tooth bone prepared in advance was grafted together with implants, and the histological findings were observed to examine bone formation effects.
In the present experiment, a total of six healthy male minipigs raised under the same conditions for a certain period (approximately 35-40 kg, 24 months old, Prestige World Genetics, Pyeongtaek, Korea) were used as experimental animals.
Autogenous tooth bone graft materials made from teeth extracted from the above minipigs were grafted on individual minipigs after placing implants (MS Implant Narrow Ridge 3.0×10 mm, OSSTEM).
Fabrication of autogenous tooth bone
Extracted teeth immersed in 70% ethyl alcohol were sent to a specialized processing institution (Korea Tooth Bank Co., Seoul, Korea), made into block shapes after attached soft tissues and foreign substances such as tartar were removed, put into a distilled water and hydrogen oxide solution, and cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner to remove remaining foreign substances. The cleaned particles were dehydrated using ethyl alcohol and underwent a defatting process using an ethyl ether solution. The autogenous teeth that underwent these processes were made to undergo a lyophilization process, disinfected using ethylene oxide gas, packed and delivered to the laboratory, and used in graft processes.
Fabrication and analysis of tissue specimens
Before fabricating specimens for tissue observation from the experimental animals, a mixture of xylazine HCL (2.3 mg/kg, Bayer) and ketamine (5 mg/kg, Yuhan Corporation) was intravenously injected into the minipigs at four, eight, and 12 weeks after graft to put the minipigs under anesthesia. Then, KCL (2 mmol/1 g, Huons) was swiftly injected into the veins to administer euthanasia and bone fragments including implements and adjacent tissues were collected immediately after the sacrifice.
The tissues collected from two minipigs per each week of collection were used in histomorphometric analysis. The collected tissues were fixed in 70% alcohol for three days and then stained first by leaving them in a Villanueva staining solution for seven to10 days. For dehydration and bleaching, the tissues were left in each of 50, 70, 80, 95, and 100% alcohol solutions for four hours and then left in propylene oxide overnight for complete dehydration. Blocks were made using epoxy resin (Eponate, Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA) and hardened for three days in an incubator at 60°C. Thereafter, trimmed sections were made using an Accutom-50 (Struers Co., Copenhagen, Denmark) and the trimmed sections were ground using a micro-cutting and grinding system (EXAKT, Exakt Co., Norderstedt, Germany) to make 10-20 μm thick tissue slides.
Images magnified by factors of 12.5 and 40 were obtained using an optical microscope (Axioscop, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the images were reconstructed to photos of the entire tissues using the Photoshop program. From these photos, the ratio of newly formed mineralized bones (NBF, new bone formation) to the entire bone defect was calculated using an image analyzer (iMTechnology, Korea). The area of newly formed bones was regarded as the area to newly formed bone boundaries including mineralized bones, remaining bone graft materials, bone marrow, fibrous connective tissues, and newly formed blood vessels. In addition, the total length of bone defects in each implant was measured as well as the bone areas in contact with the implant to calculate the contact ratio between the bones and the implant. (Villanueva stain, original magnification ×12.5, magnified photo Villanueva stain, original magnification ×40).
As a statistical method, independent sample t-tests were conducted using SSPS ver.17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and cases where the P value was smaller than 0.05 were regarded as being statistically significant.
Comparison and evaluation of peri-implant bone densities in panoramas
As a statistical method, the non-parametric Wilcoxon test of the SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) was used, and the statistical significance level was set to P < 0.05.
Comparison and evaluation of peri-implant bone densities on CT
To compare and evaluate bone densities, CT (DCTP-110-p/AlphardVEGA-3030, Asahi Roentgen Ind. Co., Japan) imaging was conducted with the control group and the experimental group at 12 weeks after implant placement. Thereafter, the photos digitized as DICOM files were converted into JPEG graphic files and the JPEGs were stored. From the stored files, bone densities were measured in the area around each implant of the minipigs (ranging from 2 mm in the buccolingual direction to 2 mm downward from the lingual upper bone boundary) using the average value of the 255 tonality gray scale using the gray-level histogram of the Adobe Photoshop CS3 program. A measurement was conducted on the axial view. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney test of the SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) was used and the statistical significance level was set to P < 0.05.
Ratio of newly formed mineralized bones (NBF, new bone formation) to entire defects
Results for new bone formation area (%)
37.00 ± 11.53
48.15 ± 18.02
32.25 ± 26.99
45.50 ± 28.37
1.33 ± 2.31
77.13 ± 15.30
Significant difference between the control and experimental group in NBF rate
Bone to implant contact ratio (BIC)
Results for bone to implant contact ratio (%)
38.33 ± 6.43
53.08 ± 19.82
33.50 ± 29.51
45.00 ± 28.37
1.33 ± 2.31
75.13 ± 16.55
Significant difference between the control and experimental group in BIC ratio
Results of comparison and evaluation of peri-implant bone densities in panoramas
Bone density increase evaluation at four weeks and 12 weeks in panoramic view
4 weeks bone density
12 weeks bone density
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
71 ± 15.97
78 ± 19.23
88 ± 16.34
98 ± 14.23
Comparison and evaluation of peri-implant bone densities on CT
Bone density comparative evaluation after 12 weeks in CT view
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Bone density after 12 weeks
87 ± 35.14
128 ± 30.61
After the bone graft, the experimental group showed an aspect of active new bone formation and grafted bone absorption and replacement by newly formed bones through substitution were observed. New bone formation was observed from the margin of the defect toward the center of the defect (Figure 3). Although the control group also showed an aspect of new bone formation, the degree was lower compared to the experimental group (Figure 4). Although the above-mentioned aspects were observed in findings at weeks four, eight, and 12, statistically significant results could only be obtained from the week 12 groups. In addition, according to findings from panorama and CT images, it could be seen that increases in bone densities in that experimental group were larger than those in the control group. The differences were statistically significant.
After the fact that demineralized bones have heterotopic osteogenicity was revealed by Urist , the same group reported that demineralized teeth have the same property . Thereafter, despite content in textbooks that said the constituents of teeth are similar to those of bones, the idea of using demineralized teeth as a bone graft material was not actually applied to clinical areas until a long time had passed and the idea was recently reported by domestic research teams to the academic world , leading to a sudden increase in attention. Autogenous tooth bones are quite likely to be utilized as a good substitute material for autogenous bones because they have an advantage of being immunologically equivalent to autogenous bones because they are bones generated from autogenous teeth as well as involving no onerousness such as the additional operations in donor sites required when autogenous bones are grafted. Autogenous tooth bone grafts have been already introduced into clinics and have been showing good outcomes in radiological and histological tests [13,14].
In the present study, minipigs’ teeth were extracted and after undergoing a 10 day fabricating period, artificial vertical bone defects were immediately formed and processed pineapple-shaped autogenous tooth bone were grafted together with implant placing bodies in a form surrounding the implant placing bodies. A healing group provided with no treatment so that artificial bone defects would be naturally healed was selected as a control group to experiment on the effects of autogenous tooth bone blocks. Although there is a time difference of 10 days, this experiment minimized the fabrication period to differentiate the experimental group and the control group in the shortest possible period, and these authors are confident that this is the most accurate experiment on the effects of autogenous tooth bone. Given that this was not an experiment to form bone defects, wait until the wounds are healed, and graft bones onto chronic bony defects, this experiment has a limitation in that it could not consider the characteristics of existing chronic diseases such as periodontal diseases. However, bearing this situation in mind, the fact that if some time is allowed to pass after extraction, experiments cannot be standardized as the shapes of vertical bone defects cannot be controlled was considered.
Whereas past studies on bone graft materials using teeth removed all of the organic components because of the risks of immunological foreign body reactions and infection, the present study was free of such risks, as the bone graft material was autogenous teeth, and thus organic matter could be preserved intact. Therefore, in addition to the bone conduction effect that is expected from existing synthetic bones made using allogenic bones, heterogeneous bones, etc., the bone-inducing effects of growth factors consisting of such organic matter could be also expected, and this fact is an advantage of autogenous tooth bone graft materials being differentiated from existing bone graft material. In fact, according to the results of an animal experiment that histomorphometrically studied autogenous tooth bones in comparison with pure synthetic bone products in minipigs, the ratio of newly formed bones was higher when autogenous tooth bones were used than when synthetic bones were used .
According to an experimental paper written by Tomoki, et al.  that compared the effects of autogenous tooth graft materials from mice and the effects of autogenous bones collected from mice’s iliac bone in mice’s lower jaw bone defects, autogenous tooth graft materials show more excellent bone formation than did the autogenous bones collected from mice’s iliac bone. The present experiment used minipigs, because they are one of the animals frequently used in bone graft experiments in the dental area as the basic constituents of minipigs’ alveolar bone are similar to those of humans, and they are one of the animals frequently used in studies of stem cells and bone graft experiments in the dental area for many reasons . In previous studies that histomorphometrically observed the effects of autogenous tooth bones in comparison with synthetic bones as a control group in existing lower jaw defects of minipigs, new bone formation was also more excellent in the experimental group . In the present study, the fact that autogenous tooth bones were used in vertical bone augmentation after forming artificial vertical bone defects in the lower jaws of minipigs is meaningful because it is a verification of block-shaped graft materials that are effective not only in bone defects with good bony housing but also vertical bone defects with poor prognoses. Following the present study, conducting studies of the effects of autogenous tooth bones in comparison with autogenous bones using minipigs is thought to be a good future research task.
When teeth have been lost, the alveolar bone begins disuse involution because it cannot be mechanically stimulated by masticatory force anymore . When the alveolar bone has been lost along with teeth losses, previous forms cannot be anatomically reproduced because the shape of the site where teeth existed previously is changed. When alveolar bone involution progresses, it will eventually accompany the form of vertical bone defects, and this situation can be encountered in most patients that visit dental clinics. In particular, compared to those forms of defects that maintain bone shapes, in the case of vertical bone defects accompanied by height decreases, poor prognoses are found when observed for long periods of time after bone grafts in most cases . Although the shapes of bone grafts can be divided into many types, the reason why the shape of a block was selected was that vertical bone defects correspond to zero wall bone defects that lack bony housing that can maintain its shape. Since powder graft materials cannot maintain their shapes, when there are vertical bone defects, bone grafts should be performed in the form of blocks that can maintain their shapes. The processed pineapple shape used in the present experiment has excellent effects in the reproduction of the form of vertical bone defects around implant placing bodies, and the selection of block-shaped graft bones avoiding powder-shaped ones became another factor contributing to the successful outcomes.
Despite its limitations, such as the fact that the results of non-parametric statistical processing were not statistically significant because the number of experimental animals used was small, the fact that the present study was not a long-term follow-up study but was a fragmentary cross-sectional study, and the fact that the present experiment was not an experiment to form bone defects, wait until the wounds are healed, and graft bones onto chronic bony defects, the present study can be said to be meaningful in that it is the first animal experiment conducted with minipigs that verified the effects of autogenous tooth bone graft materials in relation to vertical bone defects. Although additional experimental studies are necessary to evaluate the bone-inducing ability of autogenous tooth bone graft materials in more depth, based on the related information known thus far, autogenous tooth bone grafts that can maintain the advantages of autogenous bone grafts and can supplement the shortcomings of autogenous bone grafts and damage to donor sites are thought to be a new bone graft method that can substitute for autogenous bone grafts.
At all of weeks four, eight, and 12, the experimental group grafted with autogenous tooth graft materials showed higher BIC and NBF compared to the control group. However, the differences at weeks four and eight were not statistically significant.
At week 12 after implant placement, the experimental group grafted with autogenous tooth graft materials showed statistically significantly higher BIC and NBF compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
In a comparison of bone densities in panoramas at weeks four and 12, although the experimental group showed more increases in bone densities, both the experimental group and the control group showed significant increases over time (p < 0.05).
In CT findings, the experimental group showed higher bone densities compared to the control group at week 12 and the difference was significant (p < 0.05).
Based on the above results, autogenous tooth bone graft materials are thought to be good graft materials that can substitute for existing autogenous bone graft materials.
- Hiatt WH, Schallhorn RG (1973) Intraoral transplants of cancellous bone and marrow in periodontal lesions. J Periodontol 44:194–208View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellegaard B, Karring T, Davies R, Le H (1974) New attachment after treatment of intrabony defects in monkeys. J Periodontol 45:368–377View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schallhorn RG (1977) Present status of osseous grafting procedures. J Periodontol 48:570–576View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SG, Yeo HH, Kim YK (1999) Grafting of large defects of the jaws with a particulate dentin–plaster of Paris combination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:22–25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK (2001) Grafting defects using a particulate dentin–plaster of Paris combination for implant placement: a case report. Hosp Dent (Tokyo) 13:127–130Google Scholar
- Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK, Park JC, Lim SC (2002) The use of particulate dentin–plaster of Paris combination with/without platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:86–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Yoon JH, Lim SC (2004) Effect of bone regeneration of a mixture of human, bovine, pig, rabbit, or dog tooth-ash and plaster of Paris in rats. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 26:155–161Google Scholar
- Park SS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL (2008) Osteogenic activity of the mixture of chitosan and particulate dentin. J Biomed Materials Res 87A:618–623View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SG, Kim HK, Lim SC (2001) Combined implantation of particulate dentin, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:282–288View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Urist MR (1965) Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893–899View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yeomans JD, Urist MR (1967) Bone induction by decalcified dentin implanted into oral, osseous, and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 12:999–1008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY (2010) Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:496–503View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung JH, Lee JH (2011) Study of bone healing pattern in extraction socket after application of demineralized dentin matrix material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:365–374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murata M, Akazawa T, Takahata M, Ito M, Tazaki J, Hino J, Nakamura K, Iwasaki N, Shibata T, Arisue M (2010) J Ceram Soc Jpn 118:434–437View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK (2011) Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:375–379View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomoki N, Junichi W, Akiko E, Tomohiro T, Miki O (2010) A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol 81:1264–1272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKee MD, Aoba T, Moreno EC (1991) Morphology of the enamel organ in the miniature swine. Anat Rec 230:97–113View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Rel Res 355S:S41–S55View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Misch CE. Available bone and dental implant treatment plans. In Misch CE (ed.2) Contemporary implant dentistry. pp178-99, St. louis, Missouri: Mosby Co, 2008Google Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.