Skip to main content
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Download PDF

The optimal scaffold for silk sericin-based bone graft: collagen versus gelatin

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery volume 45, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Silk sericin is an active ingredient in bone grafts. However, the optimal scaffold for silk sericin has yet to be identified.

Method

A critical-sized bone defect model in rat calvaria was used to evaluate bone regeneration. Silk sericin from Yeonnokjam, Bombyx mori, was incorporated into gelatin (group G, n = 6) and collagen (group C, n = 6). Bone regeneration was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (mCT) and histology.

Results

Group C showed a larger bone volume than group G in the mCT analysis (P = 0.001). Histological analysis showed a larger area of bony defects in group G than in group C. The bone regeneration area in group C was significantly larger than that in group G (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Compared with gelatin, collagen shows better bone regeneration in silk sericin-based bone grafts.

Background

Silk sericin is an industrial waste produced by degumming. The silkworm cocoon is mainly composed of silk fibroin and silk sericin [1]. Silk sericin is bonding protein between silk fibers [2]. As silk sericin is mostly composed of hydrophilic amino acid such as serine, it is easily undergone hydrolysis as fragmented form [3]. Silk sericin has been used in cosmetics and burn dressings [1, 2] reducing unnecessary industrial waste. Silk mat-associated bone regeneration is mediated by released silk sericin from its surface [4]. Accordingly, silk sericin can be considered to have an osteo-induction property, and this is mediated by the activation of bone-resident macrophage [5].

Bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) is a potent bone inducer in the transforming growth factor-β superfamily [6]. BMP-2 can induce new bone formation both orthotopically and ectopically [7]. Recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) is synthesized from microorganism or cell, and it has been widely used for bone tissue engineering. Because of the early loss of rhBMP-2 at the application site, a very high dose is required for bone regeneration [8]. In addition to the high cost of rhBMP-2, its direct application may result in postoperative complications such as severe inflammation [9], neoplasm [10], and ectopic bone formation [4]. Since silk sericin can induce BMP-2 expression in macrophages, applying it to bony defects can accelerate bone regeneration in a physiological manner, and it is much cheaper than rhBMP-2 [5]. Because silk sericin is primarily a hydrophilic protein, a scaffold may be required for its application to bony defects.

A collagen plug can be applied to the extraction socket. Collagen plugs are primarily used for ridge preservation after tooth extraction [11]. Because type 1 collagen is the primary component of the bone matrix, acellular type 1 collagen has been widely used as a scaffold for rhBMP-2, with generally acceptable results [12, 13]. Gelatin is also a component of the extracellular matrix. Gelatin sponges have been used to control bleeding. The application of gelatin sponges to tooth extraction sockets can prevent bleeding-associated complications [14]. Gelatin sponges have also been used as a scaffold [5]. However, direct comparisons of collagen and gelatin as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering are rare.

The objective of this study was to compare collagen and gelatin sponges as silk sericin scaffolds. The silk sericin was extracted from Yeonnokjam. They are a subspecies of Bombyx mori from Korea. Yeonnokjam has highest antioxidant activity among other Korea bred silkworms such as Bakokjam, Golden silk, and Hanseongjam [15]. Both collagen and gelatin were treated with silk sericin. These grafts were applied to calvarial defects in rats. Bone regeneration was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (mCT) and histology.

Methods

Sericin preparation

Yeonnokjam was prepared by the Sericultural and Apicultural Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA). The sericin from Yeonnokjam was treated by 4-hexylresorcinol (4HR) before degumming process to improve its protein conformation [16]. Gelatin sponge (Cutanplast Dental®, Uniplex, Sheffield, UK) with Yeonnokjam sericin (group G) and collagen membrane (Geistlich Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) with Yeonnokjam sericin (group C) were used as graft materials. All prepared grafts were fragmented for implanting into the bony defect. The detailed sample preparation procedure was shown in Fig. 1. Each graft contained approximately 50 μg of sericin.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic drawings of experimental procedure

Full size image

Animal experiment

We used Sprague-Dawley rats purchased from Samtako Inc. (Osan, Korea). The animal experiments were approved by the Gangneung-Wonju National University for Animal Research (GWNU-2022-7). Twelve rats that had been housed individually were divided into two groups: group G and group C. Group G (n = 6) was treated with a gelatin sponge containing sericin from Yeonnokjam, whereas group C (n = 6) was treated with a collagen membrane containing sericin from Yeonnokjam. All animals were given general anesthesia for the procedure using a combination of 0.5 mL Zoletil™ (125 mg/mL; Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea) and 0.5 mL of Rompun® (100 mg/mL; Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea). Each animal received 0.3 mL of the anesthetic solution. The subsequent surgical procedures were carried out under aseptic conditions. Following the calvarial skin incision, a critical-sized defect was created in the calvaria with a trephine bur (diameter: 8.0 mm). The calvarial bone was removed, and its periosteum was covered. Grafts were randomly assigned to each animal. After grafting into the bony defect, the flap was closed in a single layer with 3-0 black silk. To prevent postoperative pain and infection, gentamicin (5 mg/day) and tolfenamic acid (4 mg/day) were injected intramuscularly for 2 days postoperatively. All animals were monitored for 8 weeks following surgery. After 8 weeks, all rats were sacrificed, and calvaria specimens were processed for further analysis.

Micro-computed tomography (mCT) and histological analysis

Calvarial samples were analyzed using a μCT50 (Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) at the Center for Research Facilities at Gangneung-Wonju National University. The size of the bony defect (8-mm-diameter circle) originally prepared determined the region of interest (ROI). The ROI bone volume (BV) was measured using mCT software (CT Analyzer V.1.17.7.2+, Skyscan), with the grayscale threshold set between 48 and 255.

The extracted bony specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde overnight at 4 °C. After washing the fixed samples with tap water, they were placed in a decalcification solution (Cat no.: MKCL9701, Sigma-Aldrich). The samples were then placed on a rocking plate for 3–5 days. Decalcified tissues were processed in a tissue processor before being embedded in paraffin. The thickness of the paraffin sections was 5 μm. Tissue sections in the midsagittal area were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The histological images were captured using a light microscope (BX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The area of bone regeneration in the midsagittal area was analyzed at ×20 magnification. The ROI was determined based on the original defect size (length: 8 mm). Within the ROI, the area of bone regeneration was measured using image analysis software (Sigma Scan Pro 5.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Additionally, immunostaining with BMP-2 antibody (CAT# sc-137087, SantaCruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Subsequent procedure was in accord to our previous publication [16].

Statistical analysis

The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the groups.

Results

The collagen sponge incorporated with the Yeonnokjam sericin (group C) (Fig. 2a) demonstrated greater bone regeneration than the gelatin sponge incorporated with the Yeonnokjam sericin (group G) (Fig. 2b). The difference in BV between the two groups was significant (P = 0.001), with group C having a BV of 4.89 ± 0.95 mm3 and group G having a BV of 2.60 ± 0.75 mm3 (Fig. 2c). Histological analysis revealed that group G had a larger area of bony defect than group C (Fig. 3). The expression level of BMP-2 was higher in group C than in group G (Fig. 3). The area of bone regeneration differed significantly (P = 0.003) between the groups, with group C having a bone regenerated area of 0.91 ± 0.23 mm2 (Figs. 4) and group G having a bone regenerated area of 0.43 ± 0.20 mm2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The results from micro-CT analysis. A The collagen group (group C) showed multiple calcified nodules in the bony defect. B The gelatin group (group G) also showed bone regeneration. However, it was less active compared with the collagen group. C Bone volume (BV) was measured in the region of interest. BV was significantly higher in group C than in group G (*P = 0.001)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Histological analysis. The original bony defect had been prepared as 8 mm (bar in low magnification view). The residual bony defect area at 8 weeks postoperatively in the collagen group (group C) was smaller than in the gelatin group (group G). Bone regeneration from the margin was examined with high magnification view. The view of group C at high magnification showed a regenerated bony island (*). The view of group C under high magnification also showed bone ingrowth into the defect (hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar in high magnification = 50 μm). The expression level of BMP-2 was observed in the middle of bony defect. The expression level of BMP-2 was also higher in group C than in group G

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Histological analysis of bone regeneration area. Based on the defect size, the area of bone regeneration was measured and compared between the collagen group (group C) and the gelatin group (group G). The area of bone regeneration in group C was significantly larger than in group G (*P = 0.003)

Full size image

Discussion

Direct application of BMP-2 has been linked to a number of issues, such as swelling, pain, and ectopic bone formation [4, 8, 9]. By activating macrophages, silk sericin can accelerate bone healing [5]. An appropriate scaffold is required for the controlled release of silk sericin during application. Collagen and gelatin have both been used as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In this study, both scaffolds were compared for use in silk sericin-based bone grafts. In the mCT analysis, BV was significantly larger in group C than in group G (Fig. 2; P = 0.001). Histological analysis also confirmed that group C had better bone regeneration (Figs. 3 and 4). This is to the best of our knowledge, the first comparative study of different silk sericin scaffolds.

Silk sericin is the main component of silkworm cocoons which shows osteogenic properties by activating macrophages [5]. When silk mat is grafted into a bone defect, macrophages migrate into the graft as a result of the foreign body response [17]. The silk sericin released from the surface of the silk mat is recognized by bone resident macrophages via toll-like receptors [5]. Subsequently, these macrophages release BMP-2 to recruit bone forming cells such as osteoblasts. When sericin is isolated via the degumming process, the sericin + scaffold combination graft can accelerate bone healing [16]. The advantages of silk sericin usage for bone tissue engineering is (1) reducing industrial waste, (2) cheaper price compared to rhBMP-2, and (3) less complications expected compared to direct application of rhBMP-2 [5]. The disadvantages of silk sericin is (1) different level of bone regeneration performance to degumming techniques [5], (2) different level of biological performance to its species [15], and (3) difficulty in quality control during mass production compared to synthetic one. When silkworm cocoon is treated by 4HR, β-sheet structure of degumming product is increased, and it is helpful for bone regeneration [16].

Scaffolds are an important component of tissue engineering. For the rhBMP-2 scaffold, collagen, chitosan, gelatin, silk fibroin, dextran, and hyaluronic acid have been investigated [18]. Collagen has been frequently used as the scaffold for rhBMP-2 owing to its biological inertness, low foreign body reaction, and controlled degradation via cross-linking [19, 20]. The pitfalls of collagen as a scaffold are its rapid degradation, low mechanical strength, and rapid release of active ingredients [21, 22]. However, manufacturing techniques such as cross-linking can be used to mitigate these flaws [23]. In this study, type 1 collagen membrane for the guided bone regeneration was used as a scaffold for sericin because this collagen is cross-linked. A cross-linked collagen matrix is excellent for the growth of the osteoprogenitor cells [12]. As only 2 types of scaffolds had been tested in this study, other scaffold might show better performance for sericin. Considering the importance of a suitable scaffold, different scaffold types for silk sericin should be investigated.

In this study, collagen and gelatin scaffolds for silk sericin were compared. The sericin incorporated into collagen demonstrated better bone regeneration than gelatin (Figs. 2 and 3). Gelatin can immobilize rhBMP-2 and release it slowly in a controlled manner [24]. In some cases, rhBMP-2 is first incorporated into gelatin, which is then mixed with chitosan/collagen scaffold [25]. Gelatin has an advantage as a protein carrier owing to its protein stabilizing ability and sustained release [26]. The high porosity of gelatin facilitates protein absorption [27]. However, due to its rapid degeneration, gelatin sponge alone may not be an ideal scaffold for bone graft [28]. BMP-2 has a positive surface charge and has a high binding affinity for negatively charged heparin [29]. Using this characteristic of BMP-2, poly-glutamic acid was utilized to enhance rhBMP-2-associated osteogenesis [30]. The surface charge of silk sericin has not yet been investigated, but there could be a difference between how it interacts with collagen and gelatin. This difference may affect how they bind to silk sericin when used as scaffolds.

This study has a number of limitations. First, a number of characteristics could impact the performance of scaffolding. Even for collagen, pore size, cross-linking method, and source can affect a tissue’s regenerative ability [22, 23]. Second, there are multiple subspecies of Bombyx mori [31]. In our preliminary study, the sericin from different subspecies induced BMP-2 in macrophages to varying degrees (data not shown). As the amino acid sequence of the same type of protein can vary between subspecies, its binding affinity to the target protein will also vary. Third, as this was a preliminary study, the number of animals in this study was relatively small. There may be differences in the capacity for healing among experimental animals. Although there was a significant difference between groups in this study, considering the aforementioned points, further confirmative studies should be conducted.

Conclusion

In this study, two different scaffold types for silk sericin-based bone graft were evaluated. Collagen demonstrated superior bone regeneration for silk sericin-based bone graft when compared with gelatin.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

4HR:

4-Hexylresorcinol

BMP-2:

Bone morphogenic protein-2

mCT:

Micro-computed tomography

ROI:

Region of interest

References

  1. Giovannelli L, Milanesi A, Ugazio E, Fracchia L, Segale L (2021) Effect of methyl-β-cyclodextrin and trehalose on the freeze-drying and spray-drying of sericin for cosmetic purposes. Pharmaceuticals 14(3):262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamalathevan P, Ooi PS, Loo YL (2018) Silk-based biomaterials in cutaneous wound healing: a systematic review. Adv Skin Wound Care 31(12):565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandal BB, Priya AS, Kundu S (2009) Novel silk sericin/gelatin 3-D scaffolds and 2-D films: fabrication and characterization for potential tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 5:3007–3020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jo YY, Kweon H, Kim DW, Baek K, Kim MK, Kim SG et al (2017) Bone regeneration is associated with the concentration of tumour necrosis factor-α induced by sericin released from a silk mat. Sci Rep 7:15589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jo YY, Kweon H, Kim DW, Baek K, Chae WS, Kang YJ et al (2021) Silk sericin application increases bone morphogenic protein-2/4 expression via a toll-like receptor-mediated pathway. Int J Biol Macromol 190:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseinkhani H, Yamamoto M, Inatsugu Y, Hiraoka Y, Inoue S, Shimokawa H et al (2006) Enhanced ectopic bone formation using a combination of plasmid DNA impregnation into 3-D scaffold and bioreactor perfusion culture. Biomaterials 27(8):1387–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zara JN, Siu RK, Zhang X, Shen J, Ngo R, Lee M et al (2011) High doses of bone morphogenetic protein 2 induce structurally abnormal bone and inflammation in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A 17(9−10):1389–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmonds MC, Brown JV, Heirs MK, Higgins JP, Mannion RJ, Rodgers MA et al (2013) Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data. Ann Intern Med 158(12):877–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen J, James AW, Zara JN, Asatrian G, Khadarian K, Zhang JB et al (2013) BMP2-induced inflammation can be suppressed by the osteoinductive growth factor NELL-1. Tissue Eng Part A 19(21-22):2390–2401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lad SP, Bagley JH, Karikari IO, Babu R, Ugiliweneza B, Kong M et al (2013) Cancer after spinal fusion: the role of bone morphogenetic protein. Neurosurgery 73(3):440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nisar N, Nilesh K, Parkar MI, Punde P (2020) Extraction socket preservation using a collagen plug combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP): a comparative clinico-radiographic study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 14(2):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Z, Nica C, Sculean A, Asparuhova MB (2021) Positive effects of three-dimensional collagen-based matrices on the behavior of osteoprogenitors. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:708830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim BJ, Kim SK, Lee JH (2021) Bone regeneration of demineralized dentin matrix with platelet-rich fibrin and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the bone defects in rabbit calvaria. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 43:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JC, Choi SS, Wang SJ, Kim SG (2006) Minor complications after mandibular third molar surgery: type, incidence, and possible prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(2):e4–e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JW, Lee CH, Jeong CY, Kang SK, Ju WT, Kim SW et al (2021) Comparison of antioxidant activity according to silkworm cultivars. J Life Sci 31(11):1010–1018

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JH, Kweon H, Oh JH, Kang YJ, Kim DW, Yang WG et al (2023) 4-Hexylresorcinol treatment before degumming increases the β-sheet structure of silk sericin and BMP-2 expression in RAW264.7 cells. Int J Mol Sci 24(1):150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JW, Jo YY, Kim JY, Oh JH, Yang BE, Kim SG (2019) Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 41:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu X, Zhao K, Gong T, Song J, Bao C, Luo E et al (2014) Delivery of growth factors using a smart porous nanocomposite scaffold to repair a mandibular bone defect. Biomacromolecules 15:1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirahmadi F, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S (2013) Enhanced mechanical properties of thermosensitive chitosan hydrogel by silk fibers for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33:4786–4794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding K, Yang Z, Zhang YL, Xu JZ (2013) Injectable thermosensitive chitosan/β-glycerophosphate/collagen hydrogel maintains the plasticity of skeletal muscle satellite cells and supports their in vivo viability. Cell Biol Int 37:977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Uludag H, D'Augusta D, Palmer R, Timony G, Wozney J (1999) Characterization of rhBMP-2 pharmacokinetics implanted with biomaterial carriers in the rat ectopic model. J Biomed Mater Res 46(2):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Polo CI, Sendyk WR, Correa L, Sendyk D, Deboni MCZ, Naclério-Homem MDG (2020) Synergism between recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/absorbable collagen sponge and bone substitutes favors vertical bone augmentation and the resorption rate of the biomaterials: histomorphometric and 3D microcomputed tomography analysis. J Periodontol 91(10):1295–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geiger M, Li RH, Friess W (2003) Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55(12):1613–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun JS, Wu SY, Lin FH (2005) The role of muscle-derived stem cells in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26(18):3953–3960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Song WY, Liu GM, Li J, Luo YG (2016) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 sustained delivery by hydrogels with microspheres repairs rabbit mandibular defects. Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(6):750–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kodali A, Lim TC, Leong DT, Tong YW (2014) Cell-microsphere constructs formed with human adipose-derived stem cells and gelatin microspheres promotes stemness, differentiation, and controlled pro-angiogenic potential. Macromol Biosci 14:1458–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hou J, Wang J, Cao L, Qian X, Xing W, Lu J et al (2012) Segmental bone regeneration using rhBMP-2-loaded collagen/chitosan microspheres composite scaffold in a rabbit model. Biomed Mater 7:035002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yao L, Phan F, Li Y (2013) Collagen microsphere serving as a cell carrier supports oligodendrocyte progenitor cell growth and differentiation for neurite myelination in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther 4:109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terauchi M, Ikeda G, Nishida K, Tamura A, Yamaguchi S, Harada K et al (2015) Supramolecular polyelectrolyte complexes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 with sulfonated polyrotaxanes to induce enhanced osteogenic differentiation. Macromol Biosci 15(7):953–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu J, Wang Z, Miszuk JM, Zeng E, Sun H (2022) High molecular weight poly (glutamic acid) to improve BMP2-induced osteogenic differentiation. Mol Pharm Online first at Jun 8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00141

  31. Lee DY, Cho JM, Yun SM, Hong KS, Ji SD, Son JG et al (2017) Comparison of silkworm powder from 3 Bombyx mori varieties on alcohol metabolism in rats. Int J Indust Entomol 35(1):22–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project no. PJ01562603)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Funding

This study was conducted with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project no. PJ01562603)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sericultural and Apicultural Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea

    Ji Hae Lee & HaeYong Kweon

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, 28644, Republic of Korea

    Ji-Hyeon Oh & Seong-Gon Kim

Authors
  1. Ji Hae Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. HaeYong Kweon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji-Hyeon Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seong-Gon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Silk sericin has been prepared by LJH and KHY. Animal experiment was conducted by OJH. Data collection and analysis were done by KSG. Manuscript was written by LJH and KSG. All authors performed review of original draft. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Gon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experiments were approved by the Gangneung-Wonju National University for Animal Research (GWNU-2022-7).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. KSG is an editorial board member of MPRS.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.H., Kweon, H., Oh, JH. et al. The optimal scaffold for silk sericin-based bone graft: collagen versus gelatin. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 45, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00368-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00368-0

Keywords