Although the effects of several techniques for malarplasty have been examined, the main outcomes assessed have been self-reported patient satisfaction [6, 10, 13, 16] and operator evaluations of the changes in eminence projection and oval shape of the face [7].
Few studies have involved the quantitative evaluation of zygomatic movement using CT images obtained after malar reduction surgery [3, 15, 17, 23]. Existing reports describe the surgical outcome in a single patient based on CT findings [3] and the malar eminence reduction after bony segment removal from the anterior portion of the zygoma without arch cutting or internal fixation [23]. In two other studies in which osteotomy and rigid fixation were performed for malar eminence and arch alteration, no detailed description of the surgical method for the arch was provided and only the surgical procedure and outcome for the eminence were evaluated [15, 17]. Such an approach does not account for the possible relation between the malar eminence and arch. The surgical factors related to the two surgical sites may have combined effects on the final position of the zygoma after malarplasty. This is the first study in which the effects of intraoperative inward, AP, and upward arch movements on surgical outcomes were evaluated.
We used different bony landmarks than previous studies. The summit of the zygoma, including the zygomaticotemporal suture, has been used as an arbitrary plane for the measurement of the inner movement of the malar eminence [17]. However, the position of the zygomaticotemporal suture, used as the reference point for this plane, may change after surgery [17]. In another study, the lowest point of the zygomaticotemporal suture was used to measure the AP movement of the malar eminence [15]; this landmark is useful for the identification of changes in the malar eminence. In the present study, we used the MT as a bony landmark because it projects more visibly than the zygomaticomaxillary suture and is easily measured. In contrast, the zygomatic bone is round, which makes identification of a specific point on the suture difficult. Additionally, the zygomatic bone is more easily differentiated in Asians than in Europeans [22]. However, our personal experience suggests that, although the zygoma is clinically prominent at 45°, some patients have underdeveloped MTs, particularly when the maxillary sinus is bulging. Such cases were excluded from the present study.
The use of bony landmarks to measure changes in the malar eminence is controversial. Conflicting results of the use of anatomical landmarks for CT image analysis have been reported [3, 15, 17, 23]. Additionally, even though CT data on the same patient may be reconstructed by orienting the view at 45° using 3D analysis software, the use of a reference for orientation is controversial [19,20,21].
In this study, we compared preoperative and postoperative protrusion on CT using the same cross-sectional image-based coordinates, in contrast to other studies [15, 17]. Facial narrowing may be detected on the basis of horizontal (x-axis) changes in bony landmarks, such as zygion, defined as the most protruding part in the frontal view. Because the position of zygion may change postoperatively, changes in the three-coordinate x value for zygion do not indicate facial narrowing. In a previous study, the preoperative and postoperative positions of the malar eminence in the same cross-sectional plane were evaluated, and the arch width and eminence positions were compared by overlaying preoperative and postoperative images of the same cross-section [23].
We investigated the correlation between three surgical factors (degrees of bone segmentation and plate bending at the malar eminence and the arch) and the postoperative locations of bony landmarks. The only significant correlation was between the degree of plate bending and inward arch movement at the arch osteotomy site (r2 = 0.545). Additionally, we performed multiple regression analysis of the surgical factors identified on CT images.
The multiple regression analysis of inward movement at the malar eminence showed that the degree of bone segmentation at the eminence was the main factor involved in the inward movement of the eminence, consistent with previous findings [17, 23]. Some surgeons avoid segmentation to improve postoperative functional stability; however, our results indicate that the horizontal reduction of the malar eminence is of limited usefulness without segmentation. Thus, our results differed from previous reports of excellent reduction of the eminence, even when the malar bone was cut without body strip removal [12, 13, 15, 24].
Our results differ from those of previous quantitative analyses of the zygoma position on postoperative CT images. We found that the degree of bone segmentation was related to the medial and posterior movements of the malar eminence. Conversely, a previous study showed that the direction of movement was forward [17]. This discrepancy may be related to differences in the measurement method and surgical procedure. In the previous study, the summit of zygoma was used to measure the positional changes, whereas we measured the postoperative changes in the MT position. In the previous study, the surgeon fixed the body or eminence before the arch was fixed, whereas the arch was fixed first in the present study. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal fixation sequence.
We found that the postoperative arch location has a greater effect on AP movement than does the degree of plate bending at the eminence. In contrast to previous studies, in which changes in arch-related surgical factors were not considered [15, 17], we evaluated the effect of upward arch fixation on the backward movement of the zygoma (Fig. 6).
The multiple regression analysis showed that the application of the eminence bending plate affected the inward and AP movements of the malar eminence. The inward movement was related to the tetrapodal shape of the zygomatic bone, which has a narrow outer side and a broad inner side [25]. The step between the mobilized eminence and the untreated zygoma, including the orbit, results from the internal rotation of the eminence around a concentric center determined by arch fixation. In other words, the operator passively fitted the bending plate to the bony step, and the plate may not have induced the backward movement [23]. The operator selected the bending plate size corresponding to the step. This inference is supported by the fixation order, namely the fixation of the arch before the eminence.
Interference between the arch and the coronoid process can result in limited mouth opening after malarplasty. Thus, the surgeon should be cautious regarding the degrees of segmentation and plate bending at the arch, particularly when the coronoid process and arch are close to each other on preoperative CT images.
Inward arch movement correlated strongly with the arch plate bending size (r = 0.738, r2 = 0.545). The midface width could be reduced by cutting the arch and pre-bending the plate without resectioning the zygomatic body, in line with previous findings [16].
However, the inward movement of the arch did not accurately reflect the corresponding plate bending size, which may be explained by the surface anatomy of the zygoma. Surgeons probably expect the bending plate used for the arch to be involved only in inward arch movement. However, the diversity of arch shapes can change the 3D placement of the plate (Fig. 5). Thus, the 3D shape of the arch osteotomy site must be considered before surgery. The curvature or inclination of the fixation site affects the differences in bone movement on the x, y, and, z axes [17, 25]. The upper part of the arch is located laterally and the lower part is located mesially. This shape accounts for the bony inclination in the coronal plane. Greater bony inclination is associated with greater upward arch movement and reduced inward movement after fixation (Fig. 6a–f). Greater vertical inclination of the arch is associated with greater medial movement.
The arch is widest in front of the articular eminence, and its curvature in the axial plane accounts for the anterior arch movement induced by the bending plate after fixation. Figures 6g–i show the anterior locations of the arch according to the curvature of the arch. The diversity in arch shape enables the use of a bending plate, which affects inner, upward, and forward arch movements. As a result, the degree of bending does not accurately reflect the inward movement of the arch.
The most accurate technique for malarplasty involves the use of a customized surgical stent [26, 27]. However, this technique is time consuming and expensive. Additionally, the bone in the anterior maxillary wall is thin, rendering fixation of the metal plate in the desired position difficult. Furthermore, extensive dissection is required for stent use, which can cause the cheeks to droop. Thus, the surgical variables that affect outcomes after application of the currently available surgical techniques must be identified.
The ultimate goal of reduction malarplasty is esthetic soft tissue changes. The universal use of cone beam CT has made it possible to observe soft tissue changes according to bone movement [28, 29]. However, these studies only provide information on the amount of change in soft tissue caused by the final position of the bone. Regarding the effect of internal bone movement on the horizontal reduction of soft tissue, our study is meaningful in that it analyzed the factors affecting inward bone movement in a specific area in detail [28].
Additional studies involving finite element analysis of surgical outcomes are required. We found that the bone movement due to the bending plate differed according to the curvature of the zygoma, which should be considered in future such studies.